Comments on: Transparency in process http://www.jonobacon.org/2006/08/31/transparency-in-process/ At home with Jono Bacon, Community Manager and Author Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: tecosystems http://www.jonobacon.org/2006/08/31/transparency-in-process/comment-page-1/#comment-2453 tecosystems Sat, 02 Sep 2006 05:18:06 +0000 http://www.jonobacon.org/?p=751#comment-2453 <p><strong>links for 2006-09-02...</strong></p> <p>Schneier on Security: What the Terrorists Want "And our job is to fight those politicians who use fear as an excuse to take away our liberties and promote security theater that wastes money and doesn't make us any safer."......</p> links for 2006-09-02…

Schneier on Security: What the Terrorists Want “And our job is to fight those politicians who use fear as an excuse to take away our liberties and promote security theater that wastes money and doesn’t make us any safer.”……

]]> By: Garoth Thorp http://www.jonobacon.org/2006/08/31/transparency-in-process/comment-page-1/#comment-2439 Garoth Thorp Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:06:31 +0000 http://www.jonobacon.org/?p=751#comment-2439 <p>Reminds me of a philosophical piece that I wrote: http://forestofthought.com/philosophy/open-source/open-source-open-mind-open-life-p1/</p> <p>Good stuff.</p> Reminds me of a philosophical piece that I wrote: http://forestofthought.com/philosophy/open-source/open-source-open-mind-open-life-p1/

Good stuff.

]]> By: Luis Villa’s Blog » Miscymiscmisc. http://www.jonobacon.org/2006/08/31/transparency-in-process/comment-page-1/#comment-2424 Luis Villa’s Blog » Miscymiscmisc. Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:27:05 +0000 http://www.jonobacon.org/?p=751#comment-2424 <p>[...] Jono: totally agreed that Ubuntu’s process is generally quite transparent and an example for others. That said, the profit- what you note as ‘cheap labo[u]r’- is and must be important. Corporations get involved and stay involved because of profit. Corporations that are making money off free software are predictable and reliable (just like corporations that are locked down by licenses); corporations that are doing free software out of the goodness of their heart are not necessarily either predictable nor reliable. [...]</p> [...] Jono: totally agreed that Ubuntu’s process is generally quite transparent and an example for others. That said, the profit- what you note as ‘cheap labo[u]r’- is and must be important. Corporations get involved and stay involved because of profit. Corporations that are making money off free software are predictable and reliable (just like corporations that are locked down by licenses); corporations that are doing free software out of the goodness of their heart are not necessarily either predictable nor reliable. [...]

]]>