• Home
  • About
  • Blog Archives
  • Contact Me
  • FAQ
  • The Big 101
Subscribe: Posts | Comments | E-mail

jonobacon@home

Posted on January 23, 2007 - by jono

Misinformation: The Enemy Of Community

Community Ubuntu

Building and running communities is hard work. What is seen by some as simply a means of providing enough hands on deck to get things done is actually a much larger and more complex web of relationships, politics, resources and diplomacy. There are various factors that help community, and various factors that inhibit it – one key inhibitor being misinformation.

Since I have been working with community, I have discovered that misinformation and incorrect communication are the source of 95% of conflict and disputes. But what do I mean by the terms misinformation and incorrect communication? Put simply, any information communicated that is not known to be accurate, but communicated or inferred as accurate is misinformation. An example:

Jane talks to James about some problems with a community member called Dave:

Jane: “Well, Dave just went ahead and just switched the server off…” James: “That is terrible!”

(Jane does not actually know this fact is accurate, but heard from Sandra that Dave switched the server off, who in turn heard it from someone else who assumed it)

The problem in situations such as this is that an assumed fact is communicated to another community member with a veil of authority, and the nature of the assumption is not clearly expressed. If the assumption was clearly communicated, this is fine. Imagine this scenario instead:

Jane: “Well, I heard a rumour that Dave just went ahead and just switched the server off, but I am not 100% sure it is accurate”

James: “If that did happen, that is terrible!”

Its only a few extra words, but the clarification is utterly essential. When assumptions and rumour start getting spread around a community as fact, bad things happen.

What makes these kind of situations even more difficult is when personal relationships or conflict cloud the issue. In the above examples, imagine that Dave and Jane have already had a rocky relationship and don’t get on all that well. If Jane feels Dave has already compromised the community in the past, it is extremely tempting to assume that Dave has just switched off the server, despite the actual facts being unknown.

This can also occur in instances of celebrity. We have lots of rockstars in the Open Source and Ubuntu world, and in some scenarios an accurate communication is overshadowed by showing off that the person spoke to a celebrity. An example:

James is talking to Jane about how Dave acted like an idiot:

James: “Yeah, I was talking with Linus the other day when Dave started accusing Sandra of these problems”. Jane: “Wow you spoke to Linus?”

(Dave never accused Sandra of anything)

In this scenario, James is merely bragging about talking to Linus, and the secondary communication of Dave is deemed less important and therefore the accuracy is sacrificed in the light of fanboying Linus.

Unfortunately these kind of incorrect communications and misinformation happen all over our community, and I would like to encourage everyone to think twice when it comes to these kinds of situations. There is nothing wrong we making clear that something is an assumption or second hand knowledge that may not be 100% correct. Little improvements like this can have hugely positive impacts on our community.

So the rule of thumb is is “to assume makes an ASS out of U and ME – clarity is key“. :)



This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 23rd, 2007 at 1:19 pm and is filed under Community, Ubuntu. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

12 Comments

We'd love to hear yours!



  1. Visit My Website

    January 23, 2007

    Permalink

    neuro said:

    “I was talking to Linus, Alan Cox, Ted T’so, Marvin Minsky, Vint Cerf and John Carmack the other day, when I noticed Jono has a tiny todger.”

    :twisted:

    Reply


  2. Visit My Website

    January 23, 2007

    Permalink

    Luis Villa said:

    And for your followup post, you’re going to explain how this applies to Mark’s RH FUD, right? :)

    Reply


  3. Visit My Website

    January 23, 2007

    Permalink

    Dan said:

    Jono, I don’t mean to cause problems, but why does it seem you care more about Jokosher than Ubuntu? You blog constantly about Jokosher and how excited you are about it and I see no similar excitement for Ubuntu.

    As far as I can see Jokosher stops you from being as good of a community leader as you could be in this: you never seem excited about Ubuntu, only Jokosher.

    Reply


  4. Visit My Website

    January 23, 2007

    Permalink

    Simon Stanford said:

    So did Dave switch the server off or not?

    (I’ve never cared much for that Sandra anyway. Always causing trouble)

    Reply


  5. Visit My Website

    January 23, 2007

    Permalink

    Alan Pope said:

    ..and of course there’s never any misinformation in LUGRadio is there? :)

    Reply


  6. Visit My Website

    January 23, 2007

    Permalink

    jono said:

    Luis – every should apply to these thoughts, including everyone in that story, me, you and anyone else.

    Dan – I am hugely excited about Ubuntu, and not long ago I was criticized for writing nothing but Ubuntu, but the last few weeks have involved a lot of Jokosher posts as we are leading up to feature freeze. I am psyched about Ubuntu as I am about Jokosher, LUGRadio and anything else I am interested in.

    Simon – it will always remain a mystery. :P

    Alan – we have spread misinformation in the past – guilty as charged. It is something we are trying to stop, and part of my view is based on experiences with LUGRadio where we did it and bad shit happened.

    Reply


  7. Visit My Website

    January 23, 2007

    Permalink

    Chuck said:

    I seem to remember this quote as being accurate (from Lovechild’s tagline):

    Ade: I’m not condemning anybody. Jono: Well let’s assume, for the sake of argument you are.

    Reply


  8. Visit My Website

    January 24, 2007

    Permalink

    Andrew said:

    [...] So the rule of thumb is is “to assume makes an ASS out of U and ME – clarity is key“

    I just assume that everyone thinks I am an ass. Hence, I try to be as clear as possible. The problem may lie in people assume that their point of view is the correct one – trust not the ones you don’t know. This is obviously an over-generalisation.

    Reply


  9. Visit My Website

    January 27, 2007

    Permalink

    Nick Moffitt said:

    When you ASSIST you make an ASS-CYST. So stop assisting!

    When you ASSIGN, you make an ASS out of a SIGN! Put that thing away!

    When you ASSEMBLE, you make an ASS out of an EMBLEM. Stick to high-level languages!

    When you ASSASSINATE, you make an ASS out of an ASS out of some INNATE QUALITY. That’s too many recursive ASSes!

    Finally, when you ASSUME, you make an ASS out of UME, which is a Japanese plum. They’re yummy plums. Do not make them taste like ASS.

    Reply


  10. Visit My Website

    January 31, 2007

    Permalink

    Paul Collins said:

    However, ascorbic acid is still our friend.

    Reply


Leave a Reply


Here's your chance to speak.

Click here to cancel reply.

  1. Name (required)

    Mail (required)

    Website

    Message

  • Ad Ad Ad Ad
  • Prepare For Awesome

  • Recent Articles

    • Fixing Ubuntu Software Center Descriptions
    • Red Hat, Canonical and GNOME Contributions
    • Ubuntu Global Jam: Start Your Engines!
    • Awesome GUADEC Espresso and Coffee Bar
    • Team Reporting
    • The Five Horsemen
    • Community Leadership Summit 2010 This Weekend!
    • Ahmed Kamal Joins The Horsemen
    • Severed Fifth Update
    • Rocking The LoCo Council
  • Recent Comments

    • Inge Wallin on Red Hat, Canonical and GNOME Contributions
    • Anon on Red Hat, Canonical and GNOME Contributions
    • Greg on Red Hat, Canonical and GNOME Contributions
    • Jim on Red Hat, Canonical and GNOME Contributions
    • Adam Williamson on Red Hat, Canonical and GNOME Contributions
    • Eddward on Red Hat, Canonical and GNOME Contributions
    • HunterA3 on Red Hat, Canonical and GNOME Contributions
    • ScottK on Fixing Ubuntu Software Center Descriptions
    • Contribuciones a GNOME – Red Hat 16%, Canonical 1% | Ubunlog on Red Hat, Canonical and GNOME Contributions
    • ah on Red Hat, Canonical and GNOME Contributions
  • Flickr Photos

  •  

    January 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Dec   Feb »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
  • jb@h Rockstars This Year

    • ethana2 (30)
    • Zac (17)
    • nixternal (16)
    • Tom (12)
    • Bruno Girin (11)
    • James Duncan (11)
    • Adam Williamson (10)
    • Anon (10)
    • Brandon Tomlinson (10)
    • Jef Spaleta (10)
© 2008 jonobacon@home - At home with Jono Bacon, Community Manager and Author