OK, folks, I want to share a random idea that cropped up after a long conversation with Langridge a few weeks back. This is merely food for thought and designed to trigger some discussion.
Today my computing experience is comprised of Ubuntu and Mac OS X. On Ubuntu I am still playing with GNOME Shell and on Mac I am using the standard desktop experience.
I like both. Both have benefits and disadvantages. My Mac has beautiful hardware and anything I plug into it just works out the box (or has drivers). While I spend most of my life in Chrome and Atom, I use some apps that are not available on Ubuntu (e.g. Bluejeans and Evernote clients). I also find multimedia is just easier and more reliable on my Mac.
My heart will always be with Linux though. I love how slick and simple Shell is and I depend on the huge developer toolchain available to me in Ubuntu. I like how customizable my desktop is and that I can be part of a community that makes the software I use. There is something hugely fulfilling about hanging out with the people who make the tools you use.
So, I have two platforms and use the best of both. The problem is, they feel like two different boxes of things sat on the same shelf. I want to jumble the contents of those boxes together and spread them across the very same shelf.
So, imagine this (this is total fantasy, I have no idea if this would be technically feasible.)
You want the very best computing experience, so you first go out and buy a Mac. They have arguably the nicest overall hardware combo (looks, usability, battery etc) out there.
You then download a distribution from the Internet. This is shipped as a
.dmg and you install it. It then proceeds to install a bunch of software on your computer. This includes things such as:
- GNOME Shell
- All the GNOME 3 apps
- Various command line tools commonly used on Linux
- An ability to install Linux packages (e.g. Debian packages, RPMs, snaps) natively
When you fire up the distribution, GNOME Shell appears (or Unity, KDE, Elementary etc) and it is running natively on the Mac, full screen like you would see on Linux. For all intents and purposes it looks and feels like a Linux box, but it is running on top of Mac OS X. This means hardware issues (particularly hardware that needs specific drivers) go away.
Because shell is native it integrates with the Mac side of the fence. All the Mac applications can be browsed and started from Shell. Nautilus shows your Mac filesystem.
If you want to install more software you can use something such as
apt-get, snappy, or another service. Everything is pulled in and available natively.
Of course, there will be some integration points where this may not work (e.g. alt-tab might not be able to display Shell apps as well as Mac apps), but importantly you can use your favorite Linux desktop as your main desktop yet still use your favorite Mac apps and features.
I think this could bring a number of benefits:
- It would open up a huge userbase as a potential audience. Switching to Linux is a big deal for most people. Why not bring the goodness to the Mac userbase?
- It could be a great opportunity for smaller desktops to differentiate (e.g. Elementary).
- It could be a great way to introduce people to open source in a more accessible way (it doesn’t require a new OS).
- It could potentially bring lots of new developers to projects such as GNOME, Unity, KDE, or Elementary.
- It could significantly increase the level of testing, translations and other supplemental services due to more people being able to play with it.
Of course, from a purely Free Software perspective it could be seen as a step back. Then again, with Darwin being open source and the desktop and apps you install in the distribution being open source, it would be a mostly free platform. It wouldn’t be free in the eyes of the FSF, but then again, neither is Ubuntu. 😉
So, again, just wanted to throw the idea out there to spur some discussion. I think it could be a great project to see. It wouldn’t replace any of the existing Linux distros, but I think it could bring an influx of additional folks over to the open source desktops.
So, two questions for you all to respond to:
- What do you think? Could it be an interesting project?
- If so, technically how do you think this could be accomplished?
About 15 years ago I met Stuart ‘Aq’ Langridge when he walked into the new Wolverhampton Linux Users Group I had just started with his trademark bombastic personality and humor. Ever since those first interactions we have become really close friends.
Today Stuart turns 40 and I just wanted to share a few words about how remarkable a human being he is.
Many of you who have listened to Stuart on Bad Voltage, seen him speak, worked with him, or socialized with him will know him for his larger than life personality. He is funny, warm, and passionate about his family, friends, and technology. He is opinionated, and many of you will know him for the amusing, insightful, and tremendously articulate way in which he expresses his views.
He is remarkably talented and has an incredible level of insight and perspective. He is not just a brilliant programmer and software architect, but he has a deft knowledge and understanding of people, how they work together, and the driving forces behind human interaction. What I have always admired is that while bombastic in his views, he is always open to fresh ideas and new perspectives. For him life is a journey and new ways of looking at the road are truly thrilling for him.
As I have grown as a person in my career, with my family, and particularly when moving to America, he has always supported yet challenged me. He is one of those rare friends that can enthusiastically validate great steps forward yet, with the same enthusiasm, illustrate mistakes too. I love the fact that we have a relationship that can be so open and honest, yet underlined with respect. It is his personality, understanding, humor, thoughtfulness, care, and mentorship that will always make him one of my favorite people in the world.
Stuart, I love you, pal. Have an awesome birthday, and may we all continue to cherish your friendship for many years to come.
On Saturday I will be flying out to linux.conf.au taking place in Geelong. Because it is outrageously far away from where I live, I will arrive on Monday morning.
I am excited to be joining the conference. The last time I made the trip was sadly way back in 2007 and I had an absolutely tremendous time. Wonderful people, great topics, and well worth the trip. Typically I have struggled to get out with my schedule, but I am delighted to be joining this year.
I will also be delivering one of the keynotes this year. My keynote will be on Thu 4th Feb 2016 at 9am. I will be delving into how we are at potentially the most exciting time ever for building strong, collaborative communities, and sharing some perspectives on how we empower a new generation of open source contributors.
So, I hope to see many of you there. If you want to get together for a meeting, don’t hesitate in getting in touch. You can contact me at
firstname.lastname@example.org for GitHub related discussions, or
email@example.com for everything else. See you there!
In a week and a half I am flying out to Pasadena to the SCALE14x conference. I will be there from the evening of Wed 20th Jan 2016 to Sun 24th Jan 2016.
SCALE is a tremendous conference, as I have mentioned many times before. This is a busy year for me, so I wanted to share what I will be up to:
- Thurs 21st Jan 2016 at 2pm in Ballroom A – Ubuntu Redux – as part of the UbuCon Summit I will be delivering a presentation about the key patterns that have led Ubuntu to where it is today and my unvarnished perspective on where Ubuntu is going and what success looks like.
- Thurs 21st Jan 2016 at 7pm – in Ballroom DE – FLOSS Reflections – I am delighted to be a part of a session that looks into the past, present, and future of Open Source. The past will be covered by the venerable Jon ‘Maddog’ Hall, the present by myself, and the future by Keila Banks.
- Fri 22nd Jan 2016 at 10.30am – in Ballroom DE – Ubuntu Panel – I will be hosting a panel where Mark Shuttleworth (Ubuntu Founder), David Planella (Ubuntu Community Manager), Olli Ries (Engineering Manager), and Community Council and community members will be put under the spotlight to illustrate where the future of Ubuntu is going. This is a wonderful opportunity to come along and get your questions answered!
- Fri 22nd Jan 2016 at 8pm – in Ballroom DE – Bad Voltage: Live – join us for a fun, informative, and irreverent live Bad Voltage performance. There will be free beer, lots of prizes (including a $2200 Pogo Linux workstation, Zareason Strata laptop, Amazon Fire Stick, Mycroft, Raspberry Pi 2 kit, plenty of swag and more), and plenty of audience participation and surprises. Be sure to join us!
- Sat 23rd Jan 2016 at 4.30pm – in Ballroom H – Building Awesome Communities On GitHub – this will be my first presentation in my new role as Director Of Community at GitHub. In it I will be delving into how you can build great communities with GitHub and I will talk about some of the work I will be focused on in my new role and how this will empower communities around the world.
I am looking forward to seeing you all there and if you would like have a meeting while I am there, please drop me an email to
As I posted about the other day we are doing Bad Voltage Live in Los Angeles in a few weeks. It is on Fri 22nd Jan 2016 at 8pm at the SCALE14x Conference in Los Angeles. Find out more about the show here.
Now, I need every one of you to help provide some answers for a quiz we are doing in the show. It should only take a few minutes to fill in the form and your input could be immortalized in the live show (the show will be recorded and streamed live so you can see it for posterity).
You don’t have to be at the live show or a Bad Voltage listener to share your answers here, so go ahead and get involved!
If you end up joining the show in-person you also have the potential to win some prizes (Mycroft, Raspberry Pi 2 kit, and more!) by providing the most amusing/best answers too. Irrespective of whether you join the show live though, we appreciate if you fill it in:
For those of you unfamiliar with Bad Voltage, it is a podcast that Stuart Langridge, Bryan Lunduke, Jeremy Garcia, and myself do every two weeks that delves into technology, open source, linux, gaming, and more. It features discussions, interviews, reviews and more. It is fun, loose, and informative.
We did our very first Bad Voltage Live show last year at SCALE. To get a sense of it, you can watch it below:
Can’t see the video? Watch it here.
This year is going to be an awesome show, and here are some reasons you should join us.
1. A Fun Show
At the heart of Bad Voltage is a fun show. It is funny, informative, and totally irreverent. This is not just four guys sat on a stage talking. This is a show. It is about spectacle, audience participation, and having a great time.
While we discussed important topics in open source last year we also had a quiz where we made video compilations of people insulting our co-hosts. We even had a half-naked Bryan review a bottle of shampoo in a hastily put together shower prop.
You never know what might happen at a Bad Voltage Live show and that is the fun of it. The audience make the evening so memorable. Be sure to be there!
2. Free Beer (and non-alcoholic beverages)
If there is one thing that people enjoy at conferences is an event with free beer. Well, thanks to our friends at Linode the beer will be flowing. We are also arranging to have soft drinks available too.
So, get along to the show, have a few cold ones and have a great time.
3. Lots of Prizes to be Won
We are firm believers in free stuff. So, we have pulled together a big pile of free stuff that you can all win by joining us at the show.
This includes such wonderful items as:
A Pogo Linux Verona 931H Workstation (thanks to Pogo Linux)
A Zareason Strata laptop (thanks to Zareason)
A Mycroft AI device (thanks to Mycroft)
We will also be giving away a Raspberry Pi 2 kit, Amazon Fire Stick and other prizes!
You can only win these prizes if you join us at the show, so be sure to get along!
4. Free Entry
So, how much does it cost to get into some fun live entertainment, free beer, and a whole host of prizes to be won?
That’s right, the entire show is free to attend.
5. At SCALE
One of the major reasons we like doing Bad Voltage Live at SCALE is because the SCALE conference is absolutely fantastic.
There are a wide range of tracks, varied content, and a wonderful community that attends every year. There are also a range of other events happening as part of SCALE such as the Ubuntu UbuCon Summit.
So, I hope all of this convinces you that Bad Voltage Live is the place to be. I hope to see you there on Friday 22nd January 2016 at 8pm. Find out more here.
Today we heard the sad news that Ian Murdock has passed away. He was 42.
Although Ian and my paths crossed relatively infrequently, over the years we became friends. His tremendous work in Debian was an inspiration for my own work in Ubuntu. At times when I was unsure of what to do in my work, Ian would share his guidance and wisdom. He never asked for anything in return. He never judged. He always supported the growth of Open Source and Free Software. He was precisely the kind of person that makes the Open Source and Free Software world so beautiful.
As such, when I heard about some of his erratic tweets a few days back as I landed back home from the UK for Christmas, I reached out with a friendly arm to see if there was anything I could do to help. Sadly, I got no response. I now know why: he had likely just passed away when I reached out to him.
While it is natural for us to grieve his passing, we should also take time to focus on what he gave us all. He gave us a sparkling personality, a passion for everyone to succeed, and a legacy of Open Source and Free Software that would be hard to match.
Ian, wherever you may be, rest in peace. We will miss you
The 21st – 22nd January 2016 are some important dates you need to pencil into your calendar. The reason? That is when the UbuCon Summit is happening in Pasadena, California, USA.
Many moons ago there used to be the Ubuntu Developer Summit events. They brought together Ubuntu developers, community members, Canonical employees, and partners from all over the world. They were important not just for sharing and evolving ideas and projects but also getting people together socially.
While the Ubuntu Developer Summits were switched to an online setting, it left a gaping hole for an in-person event that brings people together. This, my friends, is what the UbuCon Summit in Los Angeles is going to help provide.
Now, to be clear, this isn’t an Ubuntu Developer Summit. It is a different type of event. It is designed for a much wider demographic: users, developers, artists, educators, partners, businesspeople, and more. The goal of the event is to have fun with Ubuntu and share ideas and opportunities, and build relationships.
The goal of the event is to share some interesting and thought-provoking content. It will feature both keynote and presentation sessions, as well as an unfconference where the audience can shape the content.
It is going to be phenomenal for content. There will be talks by Mark Shuttleworth, Elizabeth K Joseph, Stuart Langridge, David Planella, Nathan Haines, Manik Taneja, John Lea, and even my little old self. The unconference will be a wonderful opportunity to delve into a diverse range of topics that relate to the real-world conditions and needs of Ubuntu users.
Importantly though, it will be the networking and social side of the event that will be the most valuable. A big contingent from Canonical will be there, many LoCo teams and members, community members from around the world and more. It is going to be a wonderful opportunity to get the Ubuntu family together and I can’t wait to be a part of it.
Finally, the UbuCon Los Angeles is front-loading the incredible SCALE14x conference. So, not only can you get out to UbuCon but you can also join what I feel is one of the greatest Linux and Open Source conferences in the world. Oh, and as a total sweetener, myself and the rest of the Bad Voltage team will be doing a live show on the second evening of the UbuCon (which is the first day of SCALE14x).
Entrance to UbuCon (and the Bad Voltage live show) is entirely free, and entrance to SCALE14x is a really inexpensive.
So, you basically have no excuses, people. Be sure to come out and join us for an incredible time at the UbuCon in Los Angeles.
Recently I started running. I blame Jason Hibbets for this. While at the Community Leadership Summit earlier this year we got chatting about running and through some gentle persuasion he convinced me to give it a shot.
So I did. Based on Jason’s recommendations I went and bought some running shoes and started using an app called Couch To 5K. The app basically provides a series of workouts that gradually increase in intensity. Each workout involves a mixture of warming up (walking), jogging, brisk walking, and cooling down (walking).
Things were going well. Surprisingly to myself I was really quite enjoying it (more on this later) and I was sticking to the three workouts each week.
Then I made a mistake. I decided I was impatient with the app’s growing intensity and I decided to notch it up a bit. I switched the app off and significantly increased my runs, clocking in some much better workouts.
It felt great but my celebration was short-lived. Knee pain set in. After some research it became clear that the knee pain was because I pushed myself too hard. Many runners warned me of this but I ignored them. Well, I was wrong.
Fortunately though, the experience of buggering up my knee helped me to learn a lot about running that I wish I knew when I started. Thus, I wanted to share five key learnings here.
Now, to be clear: I am not a running expert. I am still very much a novice, so some experts may challenge these recommendations, but I welcome all feedback in the comments!
1. Buy The Right Shoes
Even in my first conversation with Jason the importance of getting good shoes was emphasized. I presumed though that this was mainly about getting “running shoes” as opposed to bog-standard shoes (sneakers/trainers etc).
What I didn’t realize was that we all run in slightly different ways and the purpose of a good shoe is to support you to run in the most optimal way.
As an example, it seems I tend to put a lot of press on the inside of my foot. As such, I need shoes that provide a lot of support on the inside to prevent my knee rotating as much (this was the cause of my knee pain).
Interestingly, when I went to a running store to buy shoes after my knee injury the chap in there could tell a lot about how I run from the state of my first pair of shoes. They noticeably drooped on one side, showing the impact of my foot on the inside.
So, don’t just get running shoes, but pay attention to the impact you have on your shoes and use that to make a decision about future shoes too.
2. Take It Slow
Again, one thing that was made clear to me when I started was to take it slow. Although I was using Couch to 5K, I didn’t feel like much of a couch potato, so I jacked up my pace to get my heart racing.
As I mentioned above, this was a mistake.
Running places quite a bit of stress on different parts of your body. It affects your feet, ankles, knee, quads, hams etc. Part of the reason why Couch To 5K and similar apps go so slowly is to ramp up your body gradually to get used to the impact running has on it.
As my case demonstrates, if you push yourself too hard you get injured. So, don’t do what I did: take it a step at a time (pun intended).
When I started running my wife told me to stretch when I finished my run. She showed me a few stretches and I did them for a few minutes when I got home.
When the knee injury set in, I asked one of Erica’s friends, Tabitha, who is a runner, what she thought the problem may be. She asked me to do some simple stretches and it became obvious that my body was…well…not all that stretchy. Tabitha made it clear that I needed to stretch both before and after a run.
Fortunately there are plenty of videos on YouTube that show you how. Again, I wished I had realized the importance of stretching when I got started.
4. Strengthen Your Muscles
On a related note to both taking it slowly and stretching, my interest in running helped to illustrate some basic anatomy and the importance of building strength.
What became clear to me is that muscles throughout your body play a role on different elements of running. As an example, your quads play an important role in your knee working effectively. If you don’t have strong and stretched quads, it can result in some knee pain.
As such, I discovered that the actual run is not the only important piece. Stretching before and after and taking time to build strength is important too. Again, there are plenty of videos online that can help with this.
5. The Runners High
For quite some time friends of mine who are runners have talked about the runners high. Now, it seems different people have a different idea of what this is, but it is basically a special sense of pleasure when running or afterwards.
I have to admit, I was a bit cynical about this. I don’t enjoy exercise. I never have. It feels like a neccessary evil I need to do to stay in shape and healthy.
That changed though. On my first few runs I noticed that I really enjoyed being out of the house and running. I enjoyed the feeling of the wind against my face as I ran. I felt a sense of decompression as the blood flowed and my mind detached from work. I found myself genuinely enjoying the 30 minutes or so that I was out getting started running.
This sensation continued after the run too, particularly when I was out of the shower and dressed. I felt lighter, more nimble, and a real sense of accomplishment. I am not sure if this is the runners high others get, but it is a great feeling.
What was really odd was that when I got my knee injury I really started missing getting out there to run. I would have never have imagined I would have felt this way but I love it.
So, for those of you who have read this far and are not convinced that running might be both good for you and enjoyable, give it a shot. You never know, you might just enjoy it.
Bonus: Shopping List
Before I wrap up I thought it might also be handy to share a few handy things I have purchased that can enhance the overall running experience:
- Compression Underwear – this is important for the gentlemen out there (in much the same way a sports bra is important for the ladies). You just don’t want things bouncing around down there, so get some good compression undies. I have some Asics and Adidas undies.
- Socks – good sock choice is important. Poor socks can result in blisters so get some runners socks. I use Asics white socks.
- Belt – I got myself a FlipBelt which is a handy tubular belt you can put your phone, credit card, and ID into. It saves you having to carry them separately or have bulky pockets.
- Bluetooth Headphones – I tend to listen to music sometimes when I run and sometimes I listen to audio books. I tried wired headphones on my first run and they kept falling out of my ears. So, I picked up a MPow Cheetah headset which I love. It pairs with my phone easily and sounds great.
- Water Bottle – I didn’t buy anything fancy – just a cheap plastic bottle I picked up at a conference. I shove a little ice in there on a hot day and it works fine.
Anyway, I think that is about it. Be sure to share your additional running tips or questions in the comments!
This week I had a rather frustrating customer experience. Now, in these kinds of situations some folks like to take to their blogs to spew their frustration in the direction of the Internet and feel a sense of catharsis.
To be honest, what I found frustrating about this experience was less the outcome and more the way the situation was managed. The frustration then turned into an interesting little thought experiment about the psychology going on in this experience and how it could potentially be improved.
So, I sat down and thought about why the experience was frustrating and came away with some conclusions that I thought might be interesting to share. This may be useful for those of you building your own customer service/engagement departments.
A while ago I booked some flights to take my family to England for Christmas. Using an airline Erica and I are both big fans of, we managed to book the trip using miles. We had to be a little flexible on dates/times, but we figured this would be worth it to save the $1500+.
Like anyone picking flights, the times and dates were carefully considered. My parents live up in the north of England and it takes about four hours to get from Heathrow to their house (with a mixture of trains and taxis). Thus we wanted to arrive at Heathrow from San Francisco earlier in the day, and for our return flight to be later in the day to accommodate this four hour trip.
Recently I was sent an email that the airline had decided to change the times of our flights. More specifically, the return flight which was due to leave at 3.15pm was now shifted to closer to 12pm. As such, to get to Heathrow with the requisite few hours before our flight it would have mean’t us leaving my parents house at around 5am. Ugh.
Now, to help illustrate the severity of this issue, this would mean getting a 3 year-old up at 4.15am to embark on a four hour journey to London and of course the 11 hour flight back to San Francisco. The early morning would make the whole trip more difficult.
As you can imagine, we were not particularly amused by this. So, I went to call the airline to see if we could figure out a better solution.
I called the airline and politely illustrated the problem, complete with all the details of the booking.
I was then informed that they couldn’t do anything to change the flight time (obviously), and there were no other flights that day (understandable).
So, I asked if they could simply re-book my family onto the same flight the following day. This would then mean we could head to the airport, stay in a hotel that evening near Heathrow, and make the noon flight…all without having to cut our holiday short by a day.
I was promptly informed that this was not going to work. The attendant told me that because we had purchased a miles-based ticket, they could only move us to miles-based ticketed seats the following day without a charge. I was also informed that the airline considers anything less than a 5 hour time change to be “insignificant” and thus are not obliged to provide any additional amendments or service. To cap things off I was told that if I had read the Terms Of Service this would have all been abundantly clear.
To explore all possible options I asked how much the change fees would be to move to the same flight the following day but in non-mileage based seats and the resulting cost was $1500; quite a number to swallow.
As I processed this information I was rather annoyed. I booked these tickets in good faith and the airline had put us in this awkward position with the change of times. While I called to explore a flexible solution to the problem, I was instead told there would be no flexibility and that they were only willing to meet their own defined set of obligations.
As you can imagine, I was not particularly happy with this outcome so I felt it appropriate to escalate. I politely asked to speak to a manager and was informed that the manager would not take my call as this was merely a ticket-related issue. I pressed further to ask to speak to a manager and after a number of additional pushbacks about this not being important enough for a manager and that they may not take my call, I was eventually put through.
When I spoke to the manager the same response was re-iterated. We finished the conversation and I made it clear I was not frustrated with any of the staff who I spoke to (they were, after all, just doing their job and don’t set airline policy), but I was frustrated with the airline and I would not be doing business with them in future.
Now to be clear, I am not expecting to be treated like royalty. I just felt the overall situation could have possibly been handled better.
A Better Experience
Now, to be clear before we proceed, I am not an expert on customer service, how it is architected, and the methodology of delivering the best customer service while protecting the legal and financial interests of a company.
I am merely a customer, but I do think there were some underlying principles that exist in people and how we engage around problems such as this that the airline seems to be ignoring.
Let’s first look at what I think the key problems were in this engagement:
Accountability and Assurance
At no point throughout the discussion did one of the customer service reps say:
“Mr Bacon, we know we have put you in an awkward situation, but we assure you we are going to do our level best to find a solution that you and your family are happy with.”
A simple acknowledgement such as this serves three purposes. Firstly, it lets the customer feel the company is willing to accept responsibility. Secondly, it demonstrates a collaborative human side to the company. Finally, and as we will explore later, it equalizes the relationship between the customer and the company. This immediately gets the conversation off to a good start.
Obligations vs. Gestures Of Goodwill
Imagine your friend does something that puts you in an awkward position, for example, saying they will take care of part of a shared project which they then say they are not going to have time to deliver.
Now imagine the conversation looks like this:
You: you have kind of put me in an awkward situation here, friend. What do you think you can do to help resolve it?
Friend: well, based upon the parameters of the project and our friendship I am only obliged to provide you with a certain level of service, which is X.
This is not how human beings operate. When there is a sense that a shared agreement has been compromised, it is generally recommended that the person who compromised the agreement will (a) demonstrate a willingness to rectify the situation and (b) provide a sense of priority in doing so.
When we replace thoughtful problem-solving with “obligations” and “terms of service”, which while legally true and accurate, it changes the nature of the conversation to be one that is more pedantic and potentially adversarial. This is not what anyone wants. It essentially transforms the discussion from a collaboration to a sense that one party is covering their back and wants to put in minimal effort to solve the problem. This neatly leads me to…
Trust and Favors
Psychology has taught us that favors play an important role in the world. When we feel someone has treated us well we socially feel a responsibility to repay the favor.
Consequently in business when you feel a company goes above and beyond, consumers will often repay that generosity significantly.
In this case the cost to me of reseating my family was $1500. Arguably this will be a lower actual cost to the airline, let’s say $1000.
Now, let’s say the airline said:
“Mr Bacon, as I mentioned it is difficult to move you to the seats on the flight the following day as you have a mileage ticket, but I have talked to my manager and we would be happy to provide a 30% discount.”
If this happened it would demonstrate a number of things. Firstly, the airline was willing to step outside of their published process to solve the customer’s problem. It demonstrates a willingness to find a middle-ground, and it shows that the airline wants to minimize the cost for the customer.
If this had occurred I would have come away singing the praises of the airline. I would be tweeting about how impressed I was, telling my friends that they are “different to the usual airlines”, and certainly keeping my business with them.
This is because I would feel that they took care of me and did me a favor. As such, and as we see elsewhere in the world, I would feel an urge to repay that favor, both with advocacy and future business.
Unfortunately, the actual response of what they are obliged to do and that they are covered by their terms of service shows an unwillingness to work together to find a solution.
Thus, the optimal solution would cost them a $500 loss but assure future business and customer advocacy. The current solution saves them $500 but means they are less likely to get my future business or advocacy.
Relativity and Expectations
People think largely in terms of relativity. We obviously compare products and services but we also compare social constructs and our positions in the world too.
This is important because a business transaction is often a power struggle. If you think about the most satisfying companies you have purchased a product or service from, invariably the ones where you felt like an equal in the transaction was more rewarding. Compare for example the snooty restaurant waiter that looks down at you versus the chatty and talkative waiter who makes you feel at ease. The latter makes you feel more of an equal and thus feels like a better experience.
In this case the airline customer service department made it very clear from the outset that they considered themselves in a position of power. The immediate citing of obligations, terms of service, an unwillingness to escalate the call, and other components essentially put the customer in a submissive position, which rarely helps contentious situations.
The knock-on effect here is expectations: when a customer feels unequal it sets low expectations in the business relationship and we tend to think less highly of the company. The world is littered with examples of this sense of an unequal relationship with many cable companies getting a particularly bad reputation here.
Another interesting construct in psychology is the importance of choice. Choices provide a fulfilling experience for people and it makes people feel a sense of control and empowerment.
In this case the airline provided no real choices with the exception of laying down $1500 for full-price tickets for the non-mileage seats. If they had instead provided a few options (e.g. a discounted ticket, an option to adjust the flight time/date, or even choices for speaking to other staff members such as a manager to rectify the situation) the overall experience would feel more rewarding.
The Optimal Solution
So, based on all this, how would I have recommended the airline handled this? Well, imagine this conversation (this is somewhat paraphrased to keep it short, but you get the drift):
Me: Good afternoon. We have a bit of a problem where your airline has changed the time my family’s return flights. Now, we have a 3 year-old on this trip and this is going to result in getting up at 4.15am to make the new time. As you can imagine this is going to be stressful, particularly with such a long trip. Is there anything you can do to help?
Airline: I am terribly sorry to hear this. Can you let me know your booking ID please?
Me: Sure, it is ABCDEFG.
Airline: Thank-you, Mr Bacon. OK, I can see the problem now. Firstly, I want to apologize for this. We know that the times of reservations are important and I am sorry your family are in this position. Unfortunately we had to change the time due to XYZ factors, but I also appreciate you are in an uncomfortable situation. Rest assured I want to do everything to make your trip as comfortable as possible. Would you mind if I put you on hold and explore a few options?
Airline: OK, Mr Bacon. So the challenge we have is that because you booked a mileage-based ticket, our usual policy is that we can only move you to mileage-based seats. Now, for the day after we sadly don’t have any of these types of seats left. So, we have a few options. Firstly, I could explore a range of flight options across dates that work for you to see if there is something that works by moving the mileage-based seats free of charge. Secondly, we could explore a refund of your miles so you could explore another airline or ticket. Now, there are normal seats available the day after but the fee to switch to them would be around $1500. We do though appreciate you are in an uncomfortable position, particularly with a child, and we also appreciate you are a regular customer due to you booking mileage seats. Unfortunately while I am unable to provide these new seats free of charge…I wish I could but I am unable to…I can provide a discount so we provide a 1/3 off, so you pay $1000. Another option is that I can put you through to my manager if none of these options will work for you. What would you prefer?
Me: Thanks for the options. I think I will go for the $1000 switch, thanks.
Airline: Wonderful. Again, Mr Bacon, I apologize for this…I know none of us would want to be in this position, and we appreciate your flexibility in finding a solution.
If something approximating this outcome occurred, I would have been quite satisfied with the airline, I would have felt empowered, left with a sense that they took care of me, and I would be sharing the story with my friends and colleagues.
This would have also mitigated taking a manager’s time and reduced the overall call time to around 10 – 15 minutes as opposed to the hour that I was on the phone.
To put the cherry on top I would then recommend that the airline sends an email a few days later that says something like this:
Dear Mr Bacon,
One of my colleagues shared with me the issue you had with your recent booking and the solution that was sourced. I want to also apologize for the change in times (we try to minimize this as best we can because we know how disruptive this can be).
I just wanted to follow up and let you know that if you have any further issues or questions, please feel free to call me directly. You can just call the customer service line and use extension 1234.
Jane Bloggs, Customer Service Team Manager
This would send yet another signal of clear customer care. Also, while I don’t have any data on-hand to prove this, I am sure the actual number of customers that would call Jane would be tiny, thus you get the benefit of the caring email without the further cost of serving the customer.
Now, some of you may say “well, what if the airline can’t simply slash the cost by a third for the re-seating?”
In actuality I think the solution in many cases is secondary to the handling of the case. If the airline in this case had demonstrated a similar optimal approach that I outline here (acknowledging the issue, sympathizing with the customer, an eagerness to solve the problem creatively, providing choices etc), yet they could not provide any workable solution, I suspect most people would be reasonably satisfied with the effort.
Eventually they never solved the problem in our case, so a 4.15am wake-up and a grumpy Jack it is. While rather annoying, in the scheme of things it is manageable. I just thought the psychology behind the story was interesting.
Anyway, sorry for the long post, but I hope this provides some interesting food for thought for those of you building customer service platforms for your companies.